Beyond Maximum Likelihood: from Theory to Practice

Maximum likelihood is the most widely used statistical estimation technique. Recent work by Jiao, Venkat, Han, and Weissman [1] introduced a general methodology for the construction of estimators for functionals in parametric models, and demonstrated improvements both in theory and in practice over the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE), particularly in high dimensional scenarios involving parameter dimension comparable to or larger than the number of samples. This approach to estimation, building on results from approximation theory, is shown to yield minimax rate-optimal estimators for a wide class of functionals, implementable with modest computational requirements. In a nutshell, a message of this recent work is that, for a wide class of functionals, the performance of these essentially optimal estimators with n samples is comparable to that of the MLE with n lnn samples. In the present paper, we highlight the applicability of the aforementioned methodology to statistical problems beyond functional estimation, and show that it can yield substantial gains. For example, we demonstrate that for learning tree-structured graphical models, our approach achieves a significant reduction of the required data size compared with the classical Chow–Liu algorithm, which is an implementation of the MLE, to achieve the same accuracy. The key step in improving the Chow–Liu algorithm is to replace the empirical mutual information with the estimator for mutual information proposed in [1]. Further, applying the same replacement approach to classical Bayesian network classification, the resulting classifiers uniformly outperform the previous classifiers on 26 widely used datasets.